Reply to richard T. Smith. Gregory Knapp
Tipo de material:![Artículo](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/AR.png)
Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Info Vol | Copia número | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Museo Nacional de Etnografía y Folklore Centro de procesamiento | Revistas | E/ AMER-ANT/ vol.48(1)/ Jan.1983 | no.1 | 1 | Disponible | HEMREV012693 |
The distinction between embanked and sunken fields is not merely semantic. There is good evidence for frequent flooding at Chilca. Archaeostratigraphy provides neither privileged nor unambiguous evidence for original field function. The full range of environmental, archaeological, ethnohistoric, and ethnographic evidence is more consistent with the embanked field theory than with Smith´s alternative.
No hay comentarios en este titulo.